Authority and trust
Trust in authority is best read alongside stability, responsibility, and critical distance.
A modernized version of Adorno's 1950 F-Scale (Fascism Scale). This is a psychological measurement tool purely for self-understanding, not political judgment. 20 questions across 4 dimensions.
Modernized F-Scale — Measures 4 Dimensions: Submission, Aggression, Conventionalism, System Justification · 🏛️ Authoritarian Submission
The authoritarian tendency test looks at submission to authority, reactions to norm violation, conventionalism, and system justification. The result does not evaluate any political stance; it neutrally describes how you respond to authority and stability.
Trust in authority is best read alongside stability, responsibility, and critical distance.
It separates respect for norms from the intensity of reactions to violations.
The result explores tendencies without endorsing or disparaging any political stance.
No. It does not call any stance right or wrong. It neutrally summarizes psychological responses to authority, norms, and order.
Not by itself. The score is a contextual clue for reflecting on how valuing stability and order can carry both strengths and costs.
Yes. Social experience, responsibility, and stress can shift how someone relates to authority and norms.
Authoritarian tendency results are for self-understanding and conversation. Do not use them as a basis for diagnosis, hiring, political judgment, or definitive relationship judgments.
Related Tests
Generated:
Sources
Results are reflection signals, not fixed labels. Use them alongside context, experience, and feedback from people who know you.
Sources
Results are reflection signals, not fixed labels. Use them alongside context, experience, and feedback from people who know you.