When direction is missing
Visionary gives the picture — "come with me". Strong in periods of change.
What Kind of Leader Are You?
Daniel Goleman described six styles: visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting and commanding. The point is that none of them is the right answer. A crisis calls for commanding, repairing conflict calls for affiliative, and building consensus calls for democratic. The problem is using only one of them, always.
Visionary gives the picture — "come with me". Strong in periods of change.
Coaching and democratic build autonomy, especially with experienced team members.
Commanding and pacesetting move fast, but used for long they cost you climate and retention.
Leadership is treated as a trainable capability. It is more realistic to start from your strong style and widen the repertoire than to replace it.
No. Crises and deadlines need them. Left as the permanent mode they load the team climate, so they work better as secondary styles.
That is closer to a good sign — it means you respond differently by situation. Look at which situations bring out which style.
Leadership style results are for self-understanding and team conversation. Do not use them as a basis for hiring, appraisal, or promotion.